F that

The Facebook homepage had a video advertisement for the Army on it today. How lame is that? I mean, if there's gonna be commercials up there, couldn't they at least be funny? Rather than people trying to get you to literally go to war. From what I can tell, if there is a Hell (which I am pretty much 100% sure there is not, but in the infinitely small chance that there is), I bet it would be a lot like war. Pick one - Those ancient/middle ages ones, Revolutionary, Civil, WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Iraq...being in the heat of any of those wars I imagine is as close to Hell on Earth as we can achieve.

I can't believe people even join the Army. I do not get why you would want to do that. Even in peace time. I don't imagine its a walk in the park. Sure, you can give me that talk about honor and defending your country and what not, and sacrifice--I guess that's what it comes down to. But I say leave the sacrificing to Jesus. Cuz if there were no soldiers, there couldnt really be any wars, right?

PB&J

Wow. I suck at writing blogs on a regular basis. If there are any people out there who check this blog every so often and say "man, Mike doesn't write on his blog often enough," well, I'm sorry. I did notice this the other day, though:

I was making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, and I put the jelly on first. And as I was doing this, I thought to myself, "Hmm, I'm putting the jelly on first. That's weird. I think usually I put the peanut butter on first." Now, the peanut butter and jelly sandwich is one of my all time favorite foods. It's easy to make, and it tastes f-ing fantastic. No question about it. Its not a full meal, but for a snack--or if you didn't get full from your real meal--it is just perfect. Point is, I've made my fair share of PB&Js. And as I continued to think about my PB&J-making habits, I realized that I always put the PB on before the J. I bet that this sandwich I made the other day with the jelly on first was the first I made that way in like 10 years probably. Who knows. It could be the first ever for me. The question is, why? Why did I break away from this stead-fast routine of putting the peanut butter on first? I have absolutely no idea. In any case, I like my routine, and have since gone back to putting the peanut butter on first.

In case you are wondering, some of my other favorite foods include pizza and cereal (specifically Cinnamon Life, Life, Honey Bunches of Oats, Corn Chex, Rice Chex, Frosted Flakes, and Honney Nut Cheerios). There you have it. Pizza, cereal, and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches are some of my top foods. Sounds pretty childish, no? Well F that. They all are easy to make (or buy, in pizza's case), and taste f-ing amazing. There is absolutely no substitute for breakfast on a daily basis for a couple bowls of cereal. I already went over PB&Js. And I honestly think if I was on death row, I might choose a couple of slices of Koronet's Pizza for my last meal. Koronet Pizza is a pizza place right by where I live. It's known for the size of the slice it gives you, but it is also just really good pizza. A slice is $2.75, plus a dollar more if you want a topping. Sounds expensive, right? Wrong. This is the biggest slice of pizza ever. Slices are estimated at 90 square inches (an 8.5x11 inch piece of paper is 93.5 square inches). What's a shame is that when I first got here, I could barely finish a slice. Now, I feel as if I could put down two. This built up immunity has already affected some of my friends. But that's why if I was on death row, it would have to be two slices.

I also enjoy a good steak. I might choose that as my last meal. Quesadillas are pretty dam good too. Get some chicken or steak in there, with onions, peppers, and multiple kinds of cheese....ooo wee.

If you would care to discuss your favorite foods, favorite cereals, pizza, or peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, I would be more than happy.

sorry

for that

So?

Yea, I watch a little "Weeds" now and then. Curiosity got the best of me. I kept hearing over and over about how great Weeds is, so I finally tried it. And it was fun. To be honest, I can't wait to watch it again. And I know when I run out, I'll be thinking about when I get to watch Weeds again. But let's be honest, the side effects are probably exaggerated. Sure, sometimes you're just lazy, sittin on your ass watchin Weeds all day. But they say it's a gateway show. Come on. I'll believe it when I see it. They say "it starts out with Weeds and before you know it they'll be into 'Dexter' and 'The Wire.'" Actually, The Wire does sound pretty cool. But whatever. Its my life anyway. Its "Lost" that people really should be worried about. I know way more people who are like addicted to that. And I've been on that shit for like two and a half seasons, and look how I've turned out. Just dandy. Its just way easier to get a hold of--its free for Christ's sake. Now, I got the hook up, so I get my Weeds for free, but that's another story. Point is, Weeds is pretty much harmless. It's up to parents to educate their children about the benefits and drawbacks of Weeds. I'm gonna take advantage of it while I'm young. Before it can get in the way of a regular job and other responsibilities.

WWJD?

Beep...Beep...Beep...Beep...
That's right folks, the new season of "24" is upon us. Jack Bauer returns tomorrow night as part of a two night, four hour premier event. Only on Fox. I should get paid for that.
For those of you who don't know, "24" is Fox's documentary series that follows Jack Bauer in real time as he fights terrorism and saves the world. He's already done it like 5 times. Jack Bauer received an Emmy for "Best Person Ever" last year, but accepted it under the alias "Keifer Sutherland" so as to throw off the terrorists. Last season's ending and this one's beginning can be summed up nicely by one of the Jack Bauer Facts: 1.6 billion Chinese are angry with Jack Bauer. Sounds like a fair fight.
Anyway, I wonder if during 24 Bush's approval goes up at all. Or at least if peoples' attitude on certain things change. Like how much danger we are in from terrorists, and whether torturing terror suspects for information is ok. The answer 24 gives us is yes, we are in extreme danger, and yes, torturing people works and is necessary to protect us. If we have Jack Bauer.

I will probably get called a number of names, and rightfully so, for the following:
Right now I have my computer set up so that when it starts, it plays the same sound as when 24 starts - you know, that fast series of beeps that accompany the "24" title showing up? Not the "beep...beep..." of the ticking clock for when it goes to commercial breaks. I downloaded an alarm clock and set it to play the "beep...beep..." clock tick sound every hour. And, by shear luck, the clock display on this alarm clock is red and digital. Awesome.
Before this, I had my computer set up so that when it starts, it played the main title theme of LOST--short and eerie. And, I had it so that when my computer shuts down it plays that sound that is often at the end of LOST episodes--that crescendo of instruments and then that sort of explosion-type sound that accompanies the "LOST" on the screen. Maybe I'll return to these settings once LOST returns, which I cant wait for.

Also, over the last 3 or 4 days or so, I've gotten into the new NBC show, "Heroes." You can watch all of the first 11 episodes online (along with a lot of other nbc shows). The show is good. A lot of similarities to LOST in that there is a lot going on, and a lot of it is about the unknown and destiny. The characters and acting is not as good as LOST, but it works. I like this thing networks are doing with putting full episodes of their shows online. ABC does it too, and I've been able to watch "The Nine", which also is a lot about the unknown, but with characters and acting not quite as good as LOST. I've heard NBC's "30 Rock" is good, so I might get into that. And does anyone know anything about the series that is similar to 30 Rock with Chandler in it? "Studio on the Sunset Strip" or something like that? What channel and is it any good?

Anyway, as the new year trudges on you may find yourself in some difficult situations. I advise you to refer to the title of this entry and ask yourself, What Would Jack (Bauer) Do?

A few thoughts for the New Year

As the new year begins, I figured I should write a new blog entry, b/c my last one was like a million years ago. I have a few thoughts on 2006 and 2007. They are not organized, gathered together, or consise. But I did not want to sit around thinking about what I wanted to write.

-Worst thing of 2006: people caring so much about celebrity gossip. There are entire magazines and even TV channels devoted to telling us who is too thin, who is too fat, and who is grocery shopping. Seriously, people should mind their own dam business.

-Best thing of 2006: tie: Giants sign Barry Zito, excitement for next season is renewed. I get an Ipod, put my entire music collection on it, and consequently own the coolest thing on the planet.

-Most anticipated things of 2007: new season of 24, continued season of LOST, getting drunk for basketball games

-Best thing that already happened in 2007: The Boise State vs. Oklahoma University bowl game. If you didn't see it, find a way to see highlights. An OU Interception return for a TD w/ like a minute to go to take the lead after coming back from like 18 points down, then a TD by Boise to tie it up with a lateral involved. Then, in OT, OU scores. and then Boise scores on a Statue of Liberty play! Then they go for 2 to win it! Amazing!!! AAAHHH!!!

-Songs that I was most into in 2006: 2pac - "Ghetto Gospel"; Shakira - "Hips Don't Lie"; Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg - "Still D.R.E."; Eminem feat. 50 Cent and Nate Dogg - "Never Enough"; Hart, The Clap, and The Toddfather - "The Bay's In The Area"; Queen - "Killer Queen"; Michael Giacchino - "Win One For The Reaper" (from LOST); The Game feat. Snoop and Xzibit - "California Vacation."
Note that a lot of this list is biased towards the 2nd half or latter parts of 2006, because that is what I remember most.

Other worst thing of 2006: War in Iraq. The US death toll has reached 3000, more than the death toll of 9/11 which supposedly started this whole "war on terror." Then there are the Iraqi deaths, somewhere between 30,000 and 500,000 - mostly civilian. That is sick. And there is no solution. We can either stay there, and continue to repeat history (Vietnam), or we can leave and let Iraq deteriorate into civil war.

Worst thing of 2007: See "Other worst thing of 2006"

On the Giants, Again

The football season is headed into the home stretch. Sounds like a good time to write more about baseball.

With the signing of Barry Bonds, the Giants have their starting line-up pretty much set. Let's compare it to last year's:

This year
Dave Roberts, CF
Omar Vizquel, SS
Ray Durham, 2B
Barry Bonds, LF
Pedro Feliz, 3B
Rich Aurilia, 1B
Randy Winn, RF
Bengie Molina, C

Last Year
Randy Winn, CF
Omar Vizquel, SS
Ray Durham, 2B
Barry Bonds, LF
Moises Alou, RF
Pedro Feliz, 3B
Shae Hillendbrand, 1B
Eliezar Alfonzo, C

I'm not sure if that's the exact right order for either one, but its close. Lead off spot is clearly improved. Catcher probably too. RF suffers, but Alou was hurt all the time last year, so I didnt mind seeing him go. If Feliz would finally live up to his supposed potential, and Vizquel, Durham, and Aurilia have the same year as they did last year, it's not so bad.
Giants GM Brian Sabean has taken a lot of heat lately. And there is merit to it. A lot of people are saying that much of the success of the Giants from '97 to '04 was due to Asst. GM Ned Colletti. My excellent friend Sam brought up the point that before Colletti left 2 years ago, the Giants always put together a team that was better than the Dodgers. The past 2 years (and it kills me to say this) the Dodgers have had a better team than the Giants. It also just so happens that 2 years ago the Dodgers hired Ned Colletti to be their GM. But I'm still willing to give Sabean the benefit of the doubt. His strategy of getting mediocre veterans to fill holes has not worked the past 2 years, but before that it did work ok. It was bound to happen. Plus, I can admit that Barry Bonds has tied things up a bit. But consider this: if Bonds is not injured for almost the entire 2005 season, the Giants would have gone to the playoffs (the Padres won the division by winning 82 out of 162 games). That's almost no question. I would argue that if he played the whole 2005 season, he would have been better than he was in 2006. Because when he came back in 2006, he was 2 years older than he was when he last played a season, rather than the 1 year of age most people pass between seasons. And with Barry producing more in 2006, they very well may have gone to the postseason that year as well. Furthermore, if Barry is healthy in 2005, Hank Aaron's record is already broken by now. All the hype and controversy has already passed. That's one major thing that Sabean would not have to deal with this offseason. There was immense pressure from fans to bring Barry back. But if the record was already broken, there would not be as much, and Barry probably would have retired anyway. Basically my point here, is that that if Bonds wasn't hurt in 2005, Sabean would be looking a lot better.
Now, The lineup listed above will be competitive. I think it will produce more runs than last year. But, as is usually the case for almost every team every season, the season will hinge on the pitching. The Giants have 3 young starters in Matt Cain, Noah Lowry, and Johnathan Sanchez who have potential to be sweet. There's also Matt Morris, who I don't trust at all, but who could be decent. Now, say the Giants uncharacteristically spend a bunch of money on Barry Zito to replace Jason Schmidt. It looks like a pretty sweet rotation, giving the Giants a good looking squad. But if you haven't noticed, in this post I have brought up a lot of "ifs." Knowing the Giants, they never all pan out. Plus, they say Barry Zito has never missed a start, which to me, only means he's due to get hurt. But the Giants lost Jason Schmidt, one of the top arms in the game (to the Dodgers, no less). There's no way around the fact that they need to replace him.


RIP Jose Uribe.

Got 'im - On Barry Bonds, Again

Yes, sir. Barry Bonds is still a San Francisco Giant. I'm pretty pleased. Not thrilled that he's getting $16 million, based on his lack of production last year, but that's business. Everyone is getting way overpaid this year. And I'd rather overpay Barry Bonds for one year than Juan Pierre for 4 or 5 or something.
But I'm happy. The thing is, I'm only half joking when I say that if there is a god, it's Barry Bonds. Giants fans literally worship this guy. Yet non-Giants fan literally want him dead. I think it's an amazing story that a man can be so hated by the country as a whole except for one little pocket, where is unconditionally loved. Someone should write about a thesis about it. But there's no reason for the immense hatred. There is reason for dislike. He's not a media-friendly guy, and that will bring negative attention. But there are so many people who hate him so much, and this I feel is misguided. The whole steriods thing is obviously what pushed it over the edge. He was severely disliked, and this issue gave everyone--fans, media, etc.--an exuse to expand their dislike into hatred. But for you Bonds-haters out there, ask yourself one question: "What Major League Baseball rule did he break?" The answer, to our knowledge, is that he has not broken any. Maybe he took steroids. (I remind you that still no cold-hard proof has been presented to us, and that in this country, we are innocent until proven guilty. That said, I believe he did take some steroids. But that's neither here nor there). If he did - fine, throw him in jail for steroid use. While your at it Make room for Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, Rafael Palmiero, Brady Anderson, Jose Canseco, Jason Giambi, etc. And a lot more low profile players as well. For example, Rich Aurilia, who the Giants just signed for his 2nd stint with the stint, had an out-of-body season in (I think it was) 2001. Probably due to performance enhancing drugs. Also make room in jail for me and about a billion people I know who have used pot. But stop hating this man when he didn't break any of the rules MLB had in place when he allegedly took these drugs. You are using a double standard, and you suck for doing so.
It's the same issue for the "Should McGwire go to the Hall of Fame?" debate. The answer of course, is yes. I will go as far to say you are an idiot if you think not. And that's a bold statement. I just called a lot of people idiots right there. But what Baseball rule did he break? None. Fine, keep him off the first ballot to make a little anti-steroid statement and save this celebration for Cal Ripken and Tony Gwynn. But there is no quesiton that he should be in the Hall of Fame. Babe Ruth dominated the game in the dead-ball era. Mark McGwire dominated the game in the steroid era.
There is a specific rule in the MLB rulebook that states that pitchers cannot have pine tar or any other foreign substance on their hand while pitching. Kenny Rogers did in the playoffs and World Series last year, but nothing happened to him. He broke a rule. Mark McGwire didn't.

And to close, I'd like to remind you again, as I have done before: Barry Bonds is going to break the record. It's almost a sure thing. Well, I guess that's not necessarily true. But he needs 22 HRs to break it. I'm optimistically predicting 30. Point is, he is probably going to do it. The best thing for you haters to do is to start dealing with it now. Whining about it won't do anything. Accept it. Better yet, embrace it. This is one of America's greatest records. And you are going to be alive when it's broken. It's a big deal. Love it.

Untitled

I haven't written on this thing in a while. The main reason being I have pretty much nothing to say. Here's what I can tell you:

-Thanksgiving was fantastic. I saw all sorts of aunts, uncles, cousins, a brother, and a mom. The main Thanksgiving dinner was divine. There was also all sorts of food to snack on all over the place all the time. Unfortunately, this has left me in a state of perma-hunger which cannot be satisfied in my poor independent existence.

-I am looking forward to the semester break being over and going home for Winter Break. Anyone got any ideas for New Year's?

-I miss LOST. February can't come fast enough.

Stupid jokes:
-I think girls that wear capris are indecisive.
-I love toast. I eat it all the time. You might say it's my bread and butter.
-There's s this girl who goes down on me every night. Her name is The Sun.
-What did the comedy club owner do when no one laughed at the opening comic's play-on-words jokes? Made a call to the bull-pun.
-Apparently, women like a guy who is sensitive. I was thrilled when I heard this. My penis is extremely sensitive.

I'm Famous

Read about this guy:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061108/od_uk_nm/oukoe_uk_life_cubes

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyson_Mao

He can do it blindfolded. Really fast. And I went to elementary school with him. Bitches.

Newsworthy

Fogive for writing after coming home at 3 am. Also forgive me for checking the news after coming home at 3 am.

But I couldn't help but notice this:

Right now, the top headline on cnn.com reads "After his death, a sergeant's words mean even more". The article is about a seargent in who was killed last month in Iraq. It's written by a CNN's Arwa Damon, who knew him well.

Also right now, the top headline on foxnews.com reads "Al Qaeda: We'll Never Rest Until White House Destroyed".

What do you want to be when you grow up?

Oftentimes, when people find out that I'm currently studying mechanical engineering, they ask what it is mechanical engineers do. And the answer, as you may have guessed, is a lot of things. A mechanical engineer could create (design/build/etc.) anything from 1 small part in an ink-jet printer to the entire heating/ventilation system for a football stadium.

Oftentimes, the next question I get is something to the extent of "so what do you want to do?" And the answer, as you may have guessed, is I don't know. I'm just not sure yet. Currently, I'm thinking that I would like to be in some way involved with something like this. Or this. Something that has to do with the exploration of this.

What do you want to be when you grow up?

Also, there have been 7 different World Series champions in the past 7 years. Can football say that about the Superbowl? (no)

And finally, today, I am 22.5 years old. Let's get wasted.

On Baseball

Last night's NLCS Game 7 between the Mets and the Cardinals was the best I've watched in a while. I don't get to watch many baseball games, but the point is, this one was excellent. Good pitching, good defense, high stakes (obviously), clutch performances, etc. The first thing to comment on is Endy Chavez's catch. Check it out at mlb.com. In a game tied 1-1, with his team performing horribly on the offensive end, he saves a two-run homer by jumping a good few feet from the fence, and catching the ball that was well over the wall--his elbow was above the top of the wall when he caught it. And this was a snow-cone. Then they double up the runner on first. He turns a potentially crushing two-run deficit into an inning-ending double play. The problem is, the Mets ended up losing anyway. If the Mets were to win, this play would go down as one of the best ever, given the circumstances. As is, people will be talking about it for days, maybe weeks, but not years.

Next up is that curve ball by Cardinal 9th inning pitcher Adam Wainwright. That thing was nasty. I don't even blame Cliff Floyd and Carlos Beltran for striking out looking.

Thirdly, if you are a Met fan, you have to regard this season as a failure. Since the beginning of the season the Mets were supposedly the only good team in the National League. It was gonna be them vs. the AL rep in the World Series. What they forgot was this: teams tend to pick it up in the Playoffs. Not that the Mets didn't necessarily. But they were not challenged at all in the regular season. So to face a challenge in the Playoffs--they just weren't ready for it. Their bats faltered. Good pitching will beat good hitting in the playoffs, almost always. You saw it with the Tigers beating the Yankees. You could point the finger to injuries on the Met pitching staff; they were without their #1 and #3 starters. But pitching was not the problem. The replacement starting pitching did pretty well, especially in the crucial 6th and 7th games. It was the bats that were shut down.

And finally, here's why you have to love baseball: At the beginning of the regular season, how many people predicted Cardinals vs. Tigers in the World Series? Probably about 7. At the end of the regular season, how many people predicted Cardinals vs. Tigers in the World Series? Probably like 3. Out of all eight teams going into the playoffs, these were the two worst in the home stretch of the season. The Mets and Yankees clearly had the most talent. But to win a championship, you talent and you have to perform. The Tigers and Cards did that better than the other teams, and it's those teams I will be watching while drinking on Saturday night. Cheers.

Here's something to comment on...

So I was having a discussion the other day...is there a band that "defines" our generation? First of all, its a hard quesiton because generation itself is hard to define. I think they say a generation is 30 years, but thats bull. Lets define my generation everyone between 2 years below me and two years above me. If that's two narrow, make it 3 or 4 or whatever. But I think the pop culture scene of those born between 1982 and 1986 is pretty uniform and well defined. But I digress.

I would argue that if there is a band that "defines our generation," it's Green Day. Based on awesomeness and longevity. Who else? Nirvana? Too short lived. Metallica? A bit before our time. Green Day has been more or less the band from about 6th grade until now. Between albums their popularity shrinks a little bit, but every album is a big deal. What's also interesting is that the peak of their popularity happened with Dookie - around middle school. But now, with American Idiot, they may have even surpassed that popularity. The shame is that despite how big that album is, I don't think most people know how brilliant it is. And now with the social commentary they got going on, I don't think there is a better choice for "band that defines our generation." Am I wrong? Please tell me.

The other problem with the question is that the music scene is way more diverse now than it used to be. With our parents, you can be pretty confident that its gonna be the Stones, the Beatles, or Zeppelin. Maybe Hendrix or Pink Floyd. But now, not so easy. Take hip-hop. Our parents didn't even know that hip hop would, at some time, exist. I think you could make a case for Snoop or Jay-Z defining our generation. Im not sure if they reached a wide enough audience. Maybe they did though. I wonder if there are more people my age (if any) who have not heard of Greed Day, or Snoop Dogg. I guess you probably can't define an entire 4 years across the board. You probably have to get a more narrow demographic to find a band that defines it.

Lastly, I've noticed a lack of comments. Maybe because no one reads this. Maybe not. You should comment. It makes me feel important. And come on, this is a good discussion, no?

Bronx Bombers (bomb in a bad way)

Yesterday both the Yankees and Dodgers got eliminated from the playoffs. Awesome. I told my friends that if the Dodgers won the World Series, they were going to need to be on suicide watch for me. So I'm pretty pumped that they got swept in the first round, even though I never actually thought they would win.

But it is the collapse of the Yankees that is the real story. In game one of the series vs the Tigers, their line up featured a combined 42 All-Star appearances. I'll say it again. FORTY TWO All-Star appearances. That's an average of almost 5 per player. Robinson Cano was the only one without multiple All-Star appearances. He has only one. Note that he just finished his second season. Also note that he is the Yankees' number 9 hitter and that he hit .342 this season. This is likely the most talented line up ever assembled. And they get their asses kicked around by the Detroit Tigers, a team that lost 119 games three years ago. But that was three years ago. This Tigers team is legit, and I'm happy for them. Watching them celebrate last night made me want to be a fan in Detroit.
But the point is that the sky is somewhat falling here in the Big Apple. The Yankee payroll this year was $199 million. The next closest is $69 million lower. Four Florida Marlins teams could fit in that gap (the Florida payroll is a mere $15 million). Naturally, Yankee fans are pissed. I would be too. But there are a number of things that I would like to sound off on:
It's been six years since the Yankees have won a World Series. And people are absolutely freaking out. Six years? Big fucking deal. Try being a Giants fan where it's been over 50. The fact that six years is a big deal is a testament to how lame the Yankees, their media, and their fans are. Some people are criticizing General Mangager Brian Cashman for failure to produce a championship team despite virtually unlimited resources. This is highly unwarranted. He put together an All-Star team, literally. I'd say it's up to the players at that point. I think this whole story says a lot of good things about Major League Baseball though. It shows that just getting all the talent money can buy is not necessarily the right way to go. Team chemistry is important. I love that. What I also love is the whole A-Rod saga. The guy chokes bigtime. It's just as fun rooting against A-Rod individually as it is the Yankees as a team. He makes $25 million dollars a year, and is totally not worth it. And everyone jumps on him for it, and he lets it get in his head. Awesome.
Finally, from what I am hearing, it is likely that the Yankees are going to fire Joe Torre and replace him with Lou Pinella. Bad move in my mind. I think there is a valid argument in that perhaps just a general change is needed. But as far as second guessing his decisions, that should not be the reason. Maybe he made some mistakes, maybe he didn't. But he's still Joe Torre. What about him has changed from the dynasty era of '96 to '00? But maybe the Giants will get him. That would be interesting. Although I don't see it happening. For some reason I just don't think he would fit.

In other news, I hope the T.O. saga reaches new heights today in his return to Philidelphia. Maybe like a fight with a fan or something. Or going to spike the ball at the 50 yard line again as he did as a 49er against the Cowboys. Obviously the smart thing to do after scoring a TD would be nothing. But he's not the smartest guy. And he wouldn't get even more attention paid to him, which he wants so very badly. No, T.O., don't disappoint the casual fan, and especially don't disappoint the media.

On Barry Bonds, Again

Earlier in the season, I was hoping for Barry to retire after the season. He wasnt producing, and if he came back, the Giants were probably going to have to pay him money that he didnt deserve. And lets be honest, for the Giants to start "rebuilding" (harsh word), Barry can't be in the picture. He ties up money, and he's old, and if he's not producing, it sucks. But then September came around. On the 27th of this month, in Bonds' last 28 games, he's hitting .382, with 10 home runs and 26 RBI. He has proved he still has it. He just maybe doesnt have it all season long. But he knows when to turn it on. So now I want him to come back. I can wait one more year for the Giants to start "rebuilding."

He is 21 HRs behind Hank Aaron for the all time lead. Here's the thing people: he is probably going to come back, and he is probably going to break the record. The best thing for you Bonds haters to do is to just start accepting it. Know that it is going to happen. It will make it much easier for you when he does break it. You should also know that had he not been injured last year, the record would have already been broken by now. So while I wouldn't mind if he retires, I wouldn't mind having him back either. I don't think I want him to play for another team, though. Unless he wins a world series. He does deserve that. But I know the Giants don't want to see him break the record in another uniform, and I'm not sure how much other teams want him. So my prediction is that he comes back to the Giants for one more year. And that sounds alright.

Here's what's interesting though. Say he does break the record. And say (god forbid), he doesn't get into the Hall of Fame because the media sucks ass and hates him. Then you would have the all time home run leader, and the all time hits leader (Pete Rose) not in the Hall of Fame. How rediculous would that be. I think that would be an embarassment to the sport. Almost to the point that Major League Baseball would have to do something about it. Anyway, that's my story.

On the Giants, Again

Well, the time has arrived again. The "wait til next year" season started on like Monday or something. Let me tell you, it blows. This was a frustrating season for the Giants. Hovering around .500 the whole year, but remaining in the races, but having a number of glaring faults all the while. I have to say, in my heavily biased opinion, the Giants have got to be the most frustrating team to be a fan of in all of baseball. Until they win a World Series, I will never forgive them for blowing it in 2002. That being said, I will always unconditionally love the Giants. But let's take a trip down memory lane, shall we?
1989 - I was 5 years old. This is the first season I can remember. And a magical season at that. Brett Butler, Robby Thompson, Will the Thrill, Keving Mitchell, Dave Dravecky, etc. We go to the World Series, and then just absolutely get destroyed by the A's.
[by the way, I know some people are opposed to fans referring to their team as "we." I'm not. I can see why some people dont like it, but for all intensive purposes here, its just easier. So deal with it]
1993 - This was where I really became a diehard. Barry Bonds was signed in the offseason in what would become arguably the best free agent signing in all of sports...ever. Seriously. We win 103 games, and don't go to the playoffs. The last day of the season the Dodgers beat the shit out of us, and the Braves won their 104th game. It was a horrible, HORRIBLE, day.
1997 - Another magical season. Remember the Brian Johnson game? We beat the Dodgers for the division title, and promptly get swept by the Marlins in the first round. Devastating.
1998 - Lose to the Cubs in a one-game playoff for the Wild Card spot.
2000 - Move into a new ballpark, which happens to be the best in the league, make the playoffs, but lose to the Mets in the first round.
2001 - Barry Bonds becomes the new home run king, but we don't make the playoffs, rendering the acheivement pretty much nothing to celebrate.
2002 - we dont talk about.
2003 - There is not 1 day during the regular season in which the Giants are not in first place. Who does that? Anyway, we meet the Marlins again in the first round. Jose Cruz Jr. drops a routine flyball. JT Snow gets thrown out at the plate, which ends the series and the season.
2004 - Eliminated from playoff contention by a Dodger-blue clad Steve Finley grand slam. Come on. That was horse shit.
2005 - We get Moises Alou, hopes are extremely high at the beginning of the year. But Barry can't recover from 3 surgeries until September, only plays 14 games, and the Giants have their first losing season since 1996. However, due to the sad state of the NL West, they were actually in contention for a bit towards the end of the season. We were kidding ourselves though.
2006 - Expectations are just as high as in 2005 except for the fact that they were high in 2005. And in a better, but similar season, we drag along, waiting for something to happen, and it never does.
So that's what happened in my life for the better part of the last 2 decades. So I'm making the argument that this is the most frustrating baseball team to be a part of. Like I said though, the opinion is heavily biased. Whenever a team loses in the playoffs, its devastating to their fans. But I don't know. The Giants have had more than their share. I think you could make a case for the Cubs, just cuz they suck so bad and havent won in such a long time. But the Giants have not won a WS in over 50 years, so they have to be near the top of that list. What pisses me off is that the Marlins have been in existence for less than 15 years, and they've won 2. And they don't even have fans. It should be noted that in 1997, and 2003, when the Giants were eliminated by the Marlins, the Marlins went on to win the whole thing. So it is pretty clear that the Giants were the second best team in the Major Leagues those years. But that's neither here nor there. I think you could make a case for the Braves as the most frustrating team. 14 division titles in a row, and just 1 WS ring to show for it. But at least they got 1. My life will seriously feel much more complete when the Giants win one. Plus I hate the Braves.

Shania

Apologies for posting twice in one day. Seems lame. But I've got the time I felt I needed to share. Shania Twain has always been at or near the top of my best-looking-in-the-world list. I had never seen this video all the way through though. Watch it and try and tell me that she is not the most beautiful woman ever created.

Going out

So this weekend was slightly interesting in that both Friday and Saturday nights I went out at 1:00 am. Is that weird? Back in Tacoma or Burlingame, 1 am was usually around the time we came home from the bars. But I guess that's just the way things work in NYC. It's rare that you would go out before 11, and the bars close at 4 I think. Personally, I think it's a bit of a shame. I'd much rather start drinking earlier, go out eariler, and come home earlier. Then you can wake up earlier the next day and get more out of it. But I guess New York City is just too cool.

meh

So I don't know how much you people follow sports, but the other night in LA, the Dodgers beat the Padres in what had to be one of the best finishes of all time. I can appreciate it, but since it was the Dodgers who won, I cannot enjoy it, which sucks. What happened was this: Dodgers were down by 4 in the bottom of the ninth. Then they hit back to back to back to BACK home runs to tie the game. 4 home runs in a row has happened like 4 times before this or something. And this was in the bottom of the ninth inning, to tie the game, in a battle for first place, in September. It's quite nuts. Then in the 10th inning the Padres went ahead again by a run. But in the bottom of the tenth inning, Nomar Garciapara hits a walk-off 2-run home run. Had this happened at AT&T Park in San Francisco, with the Giants on the winning end, I probably would have cried of happiness if I was there to witness it. So while I do not like Dodger fans, and I do not respect them, I am jealous of what they experienced the other night. It's not like I've never attended a dramatic Giants victory, but I have to say, this was beyond dramatic. I fucking hate the Dodgers though. Soooo much.